Dallas Employment Lawyer Blog

Why AI can’t give you real legal advice

August 5, 2024 | Robert J. Wiley

Summary: AI is an amazing tool, but its use in the legal field is limited. This article cautions against people—lawyers or non-lawyers—becoming reliant on AI that fundamentally is not intelligent or able to meet the ethical standards of giving legal advice.

To say “Artificial Intelligence” is one of the hottest topics in today’s society is probably an understatement. From Google now putting AI-generated results first for most internet searches, to the creation of AI “assistants” to help write emails, to media companies having AI draft press releases or even full news articles, you probably see AI-generated language every single week.

There’s quite a mystique around the concept, but modern AI is most definitely not like in the movies. “Generative” AI is not intelligent at all—it is basically just a computer algorithm (or several algorithms) capable of sorting through large amounts of text or images relevant to a user’s prompt to create a response based on the data it has access to. In other words, you can ask it for something, and it searches the internet or some database to put together a response. The fact that it is using information put together by humans makes it able to write responses that appear to be written by a human as well.

Understanding Legal Ethical Rules on Taking Legal Costs Out of Client Settlements

August 1, 2024 | Riley Carter

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Riley Carter

When clients settle their legal disputes, the way legal fees are handled can significantly impact their financial outcome and trust in their attorney. Legal ethics play a crucial role in guiding how lawyers manage and deduct costs from settlements. Let’s delve into the ethical rules and considerations surrounding this practice to ensure that legal professionals maintain transparency, fairness, and compliance with established standards.

The Ethical Framework

A Texan’s Guide to Unemployment Benefits

August 1, 2024 | Robert J. Wiley

Unemployment benefits provide crucial financial support to individuals who have lost their jobs. Understanding how to navigate the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC), the appeal process, and the distinction between being fired for work-related misconduct versus other reasons can significantly impact Texas employees’ eligibility and benefits.

In Texas, the Texas Workforce Commission administers unemployment benefits, determines an employee’s eligibility, and processes unemployment benefit claims.

Applying for Unemployment Benefits

The Muldrow decision might spell the end of the “severe or pervasive” standard for hostile work environments claims.

June 4, 2024 | Robert J. Wiley

Summary: This article discusses a possible future application of the reasoning in Muldrow v. St. Louis, by comparing that case to past decisions that set up the “severe or pervasive” standard.

I previously wrote about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, in which the Court made it clear that discrimination is unlawful as long as it causes “some” harm. A plaintiff does not have to meet some arbitrary bar of “significant” harm just to bring their case. Any disadvantageous change in the “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” if done for an unlawfully discriminatory reason, violates Title VII. This article explores one area, hostile work environment claims, where Muldrow’s reasoning could also apply.

The Muldrow decision was specifically about transfers, and logically it is clear that it covers other types of adverse actions that affect terms or conditions of employment. What is somewhat murkier is whether its reasoning extends to situations without a single clearly defined adverse action, such as a hostile work environment. In Texas, a federal court in Dallas just looked at this issue in Zuniga v. City of Dallas, No. 3:23-CV-2308-D (N.D. Tex. May 28, 2024). Unfortunately, in that case the court decided that because the standard for a hostile work environment had been “high” in prior cases, and Muldrow did not specifically address the issue, it did not apply. In my view, the reasoning in Zuniga is exactly the sort of reasoning that Muldrow already rejected.

Furry Colleagues: The Legal Implications of Bringing Pets into the Workplace

May 17, 2024 | Riley Carter

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Riley Carter

In recent years, the concept of bringing pets into the workplace has gained significant traction. For many, having their furry companions by their side during the workday brings a sense of comfort and alleviates stress. However, while the idea may seem simple and appealing, there are various legal considerations that both employers and employees need to take into account before implementing a pet-friendly policy in the workplace.

Health and Safety Regulations

Understanding Gaslighting in the Workplace: Recognizing Manipulation and Protecting Yourself

May 9, 2024 | Robert J. Wiley

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Rob Wiley

Gaslighting is a term that has gained prominence in discussions about psychological manipulation and emotional abuse, particularly in interpersonal relationships and professional settings. Coined from the play and subsequent films titled “Gas Light,” where a husband deceives his wife into questioning her reality, gaslighting describes a methodical strategy to undermine someone’s perceptions, memories, and sense of self.

In the workplace, gaslighting can be especially insidious, often leading to confusion, self-doubt, and emotional distress for the victimized employee. This is a particular problem for Texas employees.

21 and 7: Magic Numbers for Employees Over the Age of 40

May 9, 2024 | Robert J. Wiley

After signing a severance agreement, employees are understandably eager to be paid the funds they are owed. That’s why many employees are often frustrated to hear that they will not be paid immediately signing a severance. For workers over 40, there’s a very specific legal reason for this.

The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) are two significant pieces of legislation in the United States aimed at protecting older workers from discrimination in the workplace. When it comes to severance agreements, both laws have specific requirements that employers must adhere to that mean a delay in payments:

OWBPA Requirements:

The Advantage of Hiring a Board-Certified Attorney: Expertise, Trust, and Success

May 2, 2024 | Deontae Wherry

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Deontae Wherry

In the dynamic world of business, having the right legal team can mean the difference between success and setbacks. When it comes to protecting your interests and navigating complex legal challenges, nothing beats the expertise and specialization of board-certified employment attorneys. Here’s why investing in a board-certified employment attorney is advantageous for you:

Expertise and Specialization

New Muldrow decision makes it clear that proving illegal discrimination does not require showing financial harm.

April 19, 2024 | Robert J. Wiley

Summary: This article discusses the holding and implications of the Supreme Court decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis.

In the U.S. Supreme Court’s April 17, 2024, decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the Court reversed a lower court decision dismissing a police officer’s lawsuit over being transferred to a worse position because of sex. This reinstated her case. In concert with the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Hamilton v. Dallas County, 79 F.4th 494 (5th Cir. 2023), Muldrow hopefully represents a coming trend of courts finally rolling back decades of judge-made roadblocks to employees’ abilities to enforce their civil rights. Courts applying the law as written should give employees greater protections by removing opportunities for judges’ preconceptions or assumptions (often about people in very different circumstances from themselves) to get mixed into their rulings.

In Muldrow, the lower appellate court (the Eighth Circuit) decided that because Ms. Muldrow’s transfer did not change her rank or pay, she could not prove discrimination even if she really was transferred because of her sex. Although there was evidence the new position Ms. Muldrow was moved to was less prestigious within the department, had fewer responsibilities and perks, came with a worse schedule, and required her to give up her work vehicle, the Eighth Circuit reached that decision because it did not think those changes were “significant” enough to constitute discrimination.

Understanding Retaliation Provisions Under the Texas Health and Safety Code

March 25, 2024 | Riley Carter

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Riley Carter

In Texas, the laws governing workplace safety are robustly outlined within the Texas Health and Safety Code. Among its provisions lies protection against retaliation, ensuring that employees who report safety violations or participate in safety-related activities are shielded from adverse actions by their employers. Understanding these retaliation provisions is crucial for both employers and employees to uphold a safe and fair working environment.

The Texas Health and Safety Code, specifically Sections 260A.014, 161.134, and 142.003 prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who exercise their rights under the code. These rights include reporting safety violations, filing complaints, or participating in investigations regarding workplace health and safety.